REALITYWIPE

RESEARCHERS

The Science of PhD Pressure: Why the Mental Health Crisis in Graduate School Is Structural, Not Personal

3 the researchers behind it — "I should be able to handle this — everyone else seems fine" is the sentence that keeps PhD students from recognizing what the data actually shows: gr

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Teresa Evans

Known for:Lead author of the landmark 2018 Nature Biotechnology study establishing that PhD students experience depression and anxiety at 2.6 times the rate of comparable educated populations, and identifying advisor relationship quality as the primary wellbeing predictor

Key findings

  1. 2018

    Evans et al. surveyed 2,279 PhD students across 26 countries and found that graduate students are 2.6 times more likely to experience depression and anxiety than the general educated population, with work-life balance, advisor relationship, and career prospects as the top predictors — and mentoring-style advisors associated with rates comparable to the general population. ↗

Ghent University

Katia Levecque

Known for:Lead author of the 2017 Research Policy study surveying 3,659 PhD students in Flanders, finding that one in two experiences psychological distress and establishing work-family interface and supervisor relationship as the primary structural predictors of graduate mental health

Key findings

  1. 2017

    Levecque et al. found that PhD students in Flanders are significantly more likely to suffer from common psychiatric disorders than the general population, highly educated employees, or higher education students — and that work-family conflict, supervisory relationship, and decision-making latitude were the strongest structural predictors of PhD student mental health outcomes. ↗

Georgia State University

Pauline Rose Clance

Known for:Naming the impostor phenomenon and developing the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale

Key findings

  1. 1978

    High-achieving women in a clinical sample of over 150 persisted in an 'internal experience of intellectual phoniness' — believing they had fooled anyone who thought them intelligent — despite earned degrees, honors and professional recognition. ↗

  2. 1985

    The 20-item Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale operationalized the construct around fearing evaluation, discounting praise, and attributing success to luck — and it remains the field's most widely used and best-validated measure. ↗

  3. 1985

    Clance described the 'impostor cycle': anxiety before an achievement task drives over-preparation or procrastination; when success follows, it is credited to effort or luck rather than ability, so the underlying self-doubt survives to start the next loop. ↗

View full research file ↗All researchers