REALITYWIPE

SCRIPT CHECK · 60 SECONDS

“If I had tried harder, I'd still have a job”

See what this thought is changing.

Five quick questions show how often it appears, how believable it feels, and what it makes you avoid. You’ll get one private next step.

5 questions · about 1 minute · no account needed

What this self-check measures

This is not a diagnosis and there is no pass or fail. It measures the current frequency, credibility, and behavioral cost of “If I had tried harder, I'd still have a job”, including the private rule underneath it: Hours worked are being treated as currency that buys job security, so any hour you didn't spend feels like an unpaid debt that explains why the role disappeared.

See all result bands

QUIET

Quiet signal

“If I had tried harder, I'd still have a job” appears, but it rarely gets the final say. Keep this line available for higher-pressure moments: “My hours were never the ledger that decided this.”

PRESENT

Present in the background

“If I had tried harder, I'd still have a job” wins some small decisions before you catch it. Your useful interruption is: “A slow week doesn't owe anyone an explanation.”

ACTIVE

Active pattern

“If I had tried harder, I'd still have a job” is shaping action often enough to deserve a deliberate counterexample. Start privately and concretely: Open your calendar from the two weeks before the layoff, count the real logged hours, and write that number in a private note next to what you'd assumed it was.

DOMINANT

Getting the final word

Right now, “If I had tried harder, I'd still have a job” is steering many of the moments you measured. That is a pattern reading, not a diagnosis or character verdict. Begin with one reversible receipt: Open your calendar from the two weeks before the layoff, count the real logged hours, and write that number in a private note next to what you'd assumed it was.

Related old scripts

Related self-checks

Related science

Researchers to explore

Related mechanisms

Back to the full wipe