SCRIPT CHECK · 60 SECONDS
Five quick questions show how often it appears, how believable it feels, and what it makes you avoid. You’ll get one private next step.
This is not a diagnosis and there is no pass or fail. It measures the current frequency, credibility, and behavioral cost of “If a teammate gives up, I failed to inspire them”, including the private rule underneath it: The rule underneath is that your teammates' effort is a direct readout of your words: if someone visibly quits trying, it must trace back to something you failed to say or feel hard enough, as if motivation were a signal you transmit and…
QUIET
“If a teammate gives up, I failed to inspire them” appears, but it rarely gets the final say. Keep this line available for higher-pressure moments: “Her energy today has causes I can't see from the bench, and most of them aren't my halftime speech.”
PRESENT
“If a teammate gives up, I failed to inspire them” wins some small decisions before you catch it. Your useful interruption is: “I can say something true and someone can still have a flat quarter. Those aren't connected the way I assume.”
ACTIVE
“If a teammate gives up, I failed to inspire them” is shaping action often enough to deserve a deliberate counterexample. Start privately and concretely: Privately list five reasons a teammate might lose steam that have nothing to do with you, then note how many you actually knew.
DOMINANT
Right now, “If a teammate gives up, I failed to inspire them” is steering many of the moments you measured. That is a pattern reading, not a diagnosis or character verdict. Begin with one reversible receipt: Privately list five reasons a teammate might lose steam that have nothing to do with you, then note how many you actually knew.