SCRIPT CHECK · 60 SECONDS
Five quick questions show how often it appears, how believable it feels, and what it makes you avoid. You’ll get one private next step.
This is not a diagnosis and there is no pass or fail. It measures the current frequency, credibility, and behavioral cost of “I’ve listened to their old relationship playlist more than they ever have”, including the private rule underneath it: If I've logged more hours with their old playlist than they ever did, that must mean their past relationship was deeper and more real than whatever I'm getting from them now.
QUIET
“I’ve listened to their old relationship playlist more than they ever have” appears, but it rarely gets the final say. Keep this line available for higher-pressure moments: “A play count is my listening history, not their feelings, those aren't the same measurement.”
PRESENT
“I’ve listened to their old relationship playlist more than they ever have” wins some small decisions before you catch it. Your useful interruption is: “I don't know what any song meant to them then or means now; I know what's happening between us this week.”
ACTIVE
“I’ve listened to their old relationship playlist more than they ever have” is shaping action often enough to deserve a deliberate counterexample. Start privately and concretely: Open a private note and write three specific things from this week that show how your partner treats you now; save it without sharing it.
DOMINANT
Right now, “I’ve listened to their old relationship playlist more than they ever have” is steering many of the moments you measured. That is a pattern reading, not a diagnosis or character verdict. Begin with one reversible receipt: Open a private note and write three specific things from this week that show how your partner treats you now; save it without sharing it.