REALITYWIPE

OLD SCRIPT DETECTED

I probably came across as weird

Try this response:

I’m rereading the interaction, not reliving it.

Take the 60-second self-check

SEE THE PRACTICE

Build a response for this thought—and one move to prove it.

THE THOUGHT

I probably came across as weird

YOUR RECORDED RESPONSE

I’m rereading the interaction, not reliving it.

ONE PRIVATE MOVE

Open your notes app and write a bare-bones transcript of one recent conversation in five bullet points. Keep only observable details, then finish with: “This is what happened; the rest is my commentary.”

The conversation was fine until you started replaying it

The weirdness file you open on the way homeYou leave a normal conversation and, before your coat is fully on, the case starts building itself. The pause that was just a pause becomes awkward. The laugh that landed once now sounds odd in memory. A small stumble gets promoted into proof that you came across as strange, too intense, or off in some unnameable way.

Why the replay always sounds like a better witnessThe private review is persuasive because it only keeps the fragments that sting. It ignores how people usually rate conversations more kindly than the person replaying them does. By the time you’re alone, the interaction has already been edited into a harsher version, and that edited version feels like evidence because it arrived last.

A ten-minute way to test the charge without turning it into a verdictPick one recent conversation and write down only what actually happened, not what it meant. Just the facts: where you were, what was said, what you did with your hands, whether the other person stayed engaged, and any ordinary closing line. Then add one sentence: ‘My replay is arguing, not reporting.’ You are not proving you were smooth. You are checking whether the prosecution is overreaching.

TRACE · 01/04

How this script runs you

  • You get home from a decent interaction and immediately start scanning for the moment you sounded odd.
  • A friendly closing, like “nice talking to you,” gets filed away as habit instead of as useful information.
  • Silence after the conversation feels like a sentence, so you treat your own replay as if it were their real opinion.

SOURCE_LOCATED · 02/04

The hidden rule underneath

The Likability Audit

If you felt self-conscious at any point, the whole interaction must have looked strange from the outside, and you should assume the other person noticed more than they showed.

FORGING_REPLACEMENT · 03/04

Replacement lines (record these)

  • I’m rereading the interaction, not reliving it.
  • That one awkward second is not the whole transcript.
  • I don’t have to treat my replay like their verdict.

Generated per person in the app — these are the flavor, not your script. Yours is built from your exact words.

INSTALL · 04/04

The protocol, on one card

When I think

I probably came across as weird

I say

I’m rereading the interaction, not reliving it.

Then I do one thing

Open your notes app and write a bare-bones transcript of one recent conversation in five bullet points. Keep only observable details, then finish with: “This is what happened; the rest is my commentary.”

STATUS: READY_TO_INSTALL

Wipe this thought

4 minutes. Your voice. Free.

Start this exact wipe in the app →

The wipe protocol
  1. Write the thought exactly as it plays: "I probably came across as weird". Word for word — the wipe targets the sentence, not the vibe.
  2. Trace the rule and the avoided action. What does this thought conveniently excuse you from doing?
  3. Record the replacement lines below in your own voice. Speak like you mean it — no recording, no install.
  4. Run the loop: play it every morning and night, log one proof action a day for 7 days.

Straight answers

What if the awkward moment was real and not just imagined?

It may have been real in the sense that you felt it. That still doesn’t mean it defined the whole exchange. This thought turns one rough second into a full case file. The point of the check is to separate the moment from the verdict.

What if they were only being polite?

Politeness can be part of ordinary conversation, but your replay usually treats every warm detail as fake and every small stumble as truth. The better question is not “Was it perfect?” but “What evidence do I actually have that I was as weird as I fear?”

Why does this thought keep coming back even after harmless conversations?

Because the replay is designed to keep reopening the same file and searching for a cleaner accusation. Ordinary memory gets shorter; the self-review gets longer. That makes the doubt feel important, but not necessarily accurate.

Related old scripts

Related self-checks

Related science

Researchers to explore

Related mechanisms

The research behind this script