REALITYWIPE

OLD SCRIPT DETECTED

A warm intro to a tier-one VC would finally prove the company is real

Try this response:

A warm intro can be useful without becoming proof.

Take the 60-second self-check

SEE THE PRACTICE

Build a response for this thought—and one move to prove it.

THE THOUGHT

A warm intro to a tier-one VC would finally prove the company is real

YOUR RECORDED RESPONSE

A warm intro can be useful without becoming proof.

ONE PRIVATE MOVE

Open a private note and make two short lists under the words 'about them' and 'about us.' Put three items in each, then stop. Keep it local and private; do not send anything.

The Partner Name in the Group Chat

SCENE_01

The intro thread opens

Your phone is on the kitchen counter, face up beside a cold mug, and a mutual contact has dropped a name you recognize immediately. It is not even a hard no yet; it is the kind of soft entry that makes your chest tighten. The thought arrives whole: if this turns into a warm intro to a tier-one VC, then the company must be real after all.

SCENE_02

The room gets smaller

That reading turns the moment into a test of worth. You start treating the intro like a seal, not a conversation; if it happens, you imagine the company finally passes inspection, and if it stalls, the whole thing looks flimsy. So you hover over the thread, reread the draft in Notes, and let the investor list stay untouched because each name now feels like a spotlight.

SCENE_03

A better read, before you touch anything

A warm intro is not a stamp on the company; it is one person deciding to connect two other people. Their interest, if it comes, will be about fit, timing, and the shape of their fund, not a ruling on whether your company exists. Leave the message alone for now. Open a blank note and write two columns: 'what this intro can tell me' and 'what it cannot tell me.'

TRACE · 01/04

How this script runs you

  • A single partner name in a thread can make the whole company feel officially acknowledged or secretly exposed.
  • You keep the investor list as if each untouched name can delay embarrassment.
  • A friendly introduction can feel heavier than a term sheet because it seems to settle the question of whether you were ever building anything real.

SOURCE_LOCATED · 02/04

The hidden rule underneath

The Verdict Machine

Under this thought, the intro is treated as evidence on the company’s existence: if a top-tier VC leans in, the startup counts as real; if they do not, the whole thing feels like a polite illusion. That rule turns ordinary fundraising outreach into a verdict on legitimacy instead of a narrow fit check.

FORGING_REPLACEMENT · 03/04

Replacement lines (record these)

  • A warm intro can be useful without becoming proof.
  • Their interest says something about fit, not whether the company is real.
  • I can let the intro be a lead, not a verdict.

Generated per person in the app — these are the flavor, not your script. Yours is built from your exact words.

INSTALL · 04/04

The protocol, on one card

When I think

A warm intro to a tier-one VC would finally prove the company is real

I say

A warm intro can be useful without becoming proof.

Then I do one thing

Open a private note and make two short lists under the words 'about them' and 'about us.' Put three items in each, then stop. Keep it local and private; do not send anything.

STATUS: READY_TO_INSTALL

Wipe this thought

4 minutes. Your voice. Free.

Start this exact wipe in the app →

The wipe protocol
  1. Write the thought exactly as it plays: "A warm intro to a tier-one VC would finally prove the company is real". Word for word — the wipe targets the sentence, not the vibe.
  2. Trace the rule and the avoided action. What does this thought conveniently excuse you from doing?
  3. Record the replacement lines below in your own voice. Speak like you mean it — no recording, no install.
  4. Run the loop: play it every morning and night, log one proof action a day for 7 days.

Straight answers

Why does a tier-one VC name make the company feel real in this exact moment?

Because that name carries status in the room, so the intro starts to feel like outside confirmation. The mind turns the connection into a certificate, even though it is still just an opening between two people with their own agendas and limits.

What if the intro is warm but then the conversation goes nowhere?

That can feel like the company was exposed, but the stall only tells you that this one connection did not become a match. It does not rewrite the existence of the product, the customers you are serving, or the work already done.

Why does leaving the investor list untouched become part of this thought?

Because once the intro feels like proof, every other outreach starts to look like risking that proof. Avoiding the list protects the feeling of possible validation, but it also keeps the whole process stuck at the threshold.

Related old scripts

Related self-checks

Related science

Researchers to explore

Related mechanisms

The research behind this script