The Science of Status and Lifestyle Comparison: Why Keeping Up with the Joneses Is Wired In

TEST_YOURSELF · How well do you know this science?

1. 01 What is the Easterlin paradox?

   Richer countries are always happier than poorer onesWithin a country richer people are happier, but richer countries and rising incomes over time do not produce more happinessHappiness rises steadily as GDP per capita rises above $50,000Economic growth always reduces inequality and thus improves wellbeing

   Easterlin (1974) showed that within countries at a given time, higher income correlates with higher reported happiness — but across countries and over time, rising average income does not raise average happiness. He proposed that subjective wellbeing tracks relative income rather than absolute income, and that people adapt their happiness aspirations upward as incomes rise. source ↗

2. 02 What did Luttmer's 2005 'Neighbors as Negatives' study find about the relationship between neighbors' income and your wellbeing?

   Higher neighbor income has no effect on your happiness if your own income is stableHigher neighbor income raises your aspirations and thereby raises your wellbeingHigher neighbor income reduces your self-reported happiness, with an effect size comparable to an equal drop in your own incomeNeighbor income only matters if you interact with those neighbors regularly

   Luttmer (2005) found that after controlling for own income, a rise in neighbors' earnings predicted lower self-reported happiness — and the effect size was roughly equivalent to an equal-sized drop in the respondent's own income. This placed relative standing on the same causal scale as absolute income. source ↗

3. 03 According to Dittmar et al.'s 2014 meta-analysis, what is the relationship between materialism and personal wellbeing?

   Materialism is unrelated to wellbeing once income is controlledMaterialism is positively associated with wellbeing in wealthy countries but negatively in poor onesMaterialism is reliably negatively associated with wellbeing across all measures and cultures (r = -.19)Materialism predicts lower wellbeing only in people who are already depressed

   Across 259 studies and more than 175,000 participants, the meta-analysis found a consistent negative correlation (r = -.19) between materialistic values and all major wellbeing measures — including happiness, life satisfaction, vitality, and absence of depression — and the effect held regardless of culture, age group, or gender. source ↗

4. 04 What did Banuri and Nguyen's 2020 World Bank research find drives conspicuous consumption debt?

   Low financial literacy in lower-income householdsIncome inequality itself — more unequal societies generate structural pressure to borrow for visible consumptionMarketing and advertising targeting aspirational lifestylesA cultural preference for debt over saving in post-industrial economies

   Banuri and Nguyen modeled inequality as the structural driver: in societies with higher income inequality, households across the income distribution face greater visible gaps between their consumption and that of those just above them, creating pressure to borrow to maintain the appearance of parity — a mechanism independent of individual character or financial knowledge. source ↗

5. 05 What did Vogel et al. (2014) find about passive social media use and social comparison?

   Passive Facebook use raised self-esteem by exposing users to aspirational role modelsPassive Facebook use predicted lower self-evaluations through upward social comparisonSocial media effects on self-evaluation were only significant in teenagers, not adultsActive posting on social media was more harmful than passive scrolling

   Vogel et al. (2014) found that passive Facebook use — browsing others' profiles without posting — predicted lower self-evaluations, and that the mechanism was upward social comparison: seeing curated representations of others' lives that appear better than one's own drove the effect. Social media amplifies the comparison process; it did not create it. source ↗