SCRIPT CHECK · 60 SECONDS
Five quick questions show how often it appears, how believable it feels, and what it makes you avoid. You’ll get one private next step.
This is not a diagnosis and there is no pass or fail. It measures the current frequency, credibility, and behavioral cost of “My parents sacrificed everything for this faith, so how can I reject it”, including the private rule underneath it: What my parents gave up for this faith created a debt only my continued belief can repay, so any doubt of mine isn't just disagreement — it's a default on what they already paid.
QUIET
“My parents sacrificed everything for this faith, so how can I reject it” appears, but it rarely gets the final say. Keep this line available for higher-pressure moments: “Their sacrifice bought their conviction. It didn't buy an option on mine.”
PRESENT
“My parents sacrificed everything for this faith, so how can I reject it” wins some small decisions before you catch it. Your useful interruption is: “I can hold real gratitude for what they gave up without treating my own mind as the payment plan.”
ACTIVE
“My parents sacrificed everything for this faith, so how can I reject it” is shaping action often enough to deserve a deliberate counterexample. Start privately and concretely: Privately write one sentence naming exactly what you believe you 'owe' your parents' sacrifice, then one sentence naming what you actually think about the faith. Notice if they're different accounts.
DOMINANT
Right now, “My parents sacrificed everything for this faith, so how can I reject it” is steering many of the moments you measured. That is a pattern reading, not a diagnosis or character verdict. Begin with one reversible receipt: Privately write one sentence naming exactly what you believe you 'owe' your parents' sacrifice, then one sentence naming what you actually think about the faith. Notice if they're different accounts.